Rendered at 08:12:37 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
8-prime 9 minutes ago [-]
It's interesting to see additions to HTTP methods as it much feels like the existing ones are set in stone. At least for the time that I have been a developer.
I'm curious to see how fast the adoption/support for HTTP QUERY will be. I've had my fair share of situations where I wished for something like HTTP QUERY.
ktpsns 1 hours ago [-]
HTTP QUERY was discussed many times in the past here:
What do you think people will make the Query request body? Most everything will use this for JSON but it could be anything so what other interesting things do you think will go in there? Query 1 + 1 and get 2?
dreambigwrkhard 11 minutes ago [-]
I'm curious too. Unless the developer is really passionate about this I don't think a dev will risk (potential) compatibility issues or unexpected footguns to use this when the workarounds do seem to work quite well already. I just dont see the benefit but maybe it's because I am just not aware of a real world use case; happy to be corrected.
hparadiz 1 hours ago [-]
This feels like someone coming up with XML when JSON already exists.
flanked-evergl 44 minutes ago [-]
No, it does not feel like that.
hparadiz 5 minutes ago [-]
My framework is already two decade old prior art and you still haven't actually convinced me that this RFC solves a problem.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48568502 (4d ago, 173 comments)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29794838 (4y ago, 125 comments)